![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
Reflection by Clinton Perez is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This problem of illegals not having the right to be here is very weird but understandable. Many people don’t want them here which is why I wanted to choose it because I wanted to know why and why not? They come here for a better opportunity and they come in the many. It’s just an topic i am very interested in since I have seen people around be get deported and some have gotten permission to be here. Many people come here to have an better life and many do. Then there are those that are gangbangers and are drug dealers but we can’t be looking at the negatives. They can come take jobs people don’t even want or take. They don’t come here and ask for money. They work for it unlike many americans who don’t try to work but just sit and ask for money. I really wanted to show that they come here to help the economy and take jobs others don’t. We want to help both our countries and yours. They should have the right to be a citizen if they have a clean record which is possible for students older than 16. I tried to make it funny but I did put in a little bit of Irony, and ridicule. I mocked Americans which proves Ridicule. The Irony where I said that the Vice president was named” Gonzalez”. There were also many other types of devices I used which proves that this was indeed an satire. ![]() Reflection by Clinton Perez is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
0 Comments
In the past, there have been many laws that are beneficial to some that are in the united states. The United states has had many problems in the past. In the May of 1921, the law was passed that there were limits to be set of how many were to let by every year (http://immigration.procon.org/view.timeline.php?timelineID=000023 Historical timeline, ProCon.org, 2013). People, however, couldn’t all get in, which where people that didn’t have permission entered. On May 28, 1924 the first border patrol was authorized to keep the trespassers out(http://immigration.procon.org/view.timeline.php?timelineID=000023 Historical timeline, ProCon.org, 2013). On June 29, 1940 the first act was passed that aliens were to apply and give their information if they were in the U.S illegally. The best two divergent opinions I could find would have to be on the Democrats and the Republicans. They both have two very different opinions on the topic. The Republican party believes that it isn’t an very good idea to let the illegals in the U.S become legal because they believe that the American economy belongs to the American workers (http://www.nnirr.org/~nnirrorg/drupal/sites/default/files/republican-democratic_immigration_platform_chart.pdf Republican and Democratic Party 2012 Immigration Platform Comparison, 2012 ). The democrats on the other hand think that the immigration system is broken and that this is an chance to fix it. They believe it will also meet our goals economically and will help the nation of immigration by the many because that’s what the United States is about. There are bills that were passed indeed that helps many younger students in the United States and will or can help them academically called The Dream Act which is in effect as of now. ![]() Investigation by Clinton Perez is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The President has now decided to stop letting them in. We have now stepped up our game. The problem is that they always find a way to get in and they’re populating at a rapid speed. Who do they think they are? They cannot just come into our side and take jobs that people to don't even want, they’re ruining our economy. I mean there some of our people out there asking for money to make a living. While they on the other hand just ask and ask for jobs. They’re truly destroying our country. We need to take actions and we need to take them now. The President has announced how to stop these aliens from coming in. “They will make a bigger fence, and have the border control kill those who refuse to obey their orders” said border sheriff Joe Curtis. They have a goal which is to make a better life for their family. They think they are slick about what they’re doing, they are just trying to hurt and destroy our economy. They want to take the jobs that we don’t want and they want to hurt our economy doing it. Once they’re gone, the country will with stand on its own. Many of these words come from our president himself. We interviewed many Americans asking their opinion on what they think of about reinforcing the border. “ Our country would be safer without them” said Michael Keen. “ They are trying to kill trees “ John Berg said. What are they really plotting? They want to take jobs like those that build houses and work in landscaping. They want to take down trees so we have no oxygen and die. Thats their true goal. They want to build houses in order to have an excuse. “Then they want the ability to be legal?” exclaimed Vice President Juan Gonzalez. Study shows that 17% of the population are hispanics. They are on the rise of overpopulating us. That’s not even the worst part. There has been an bill that has been passed in congress that gives benefits to those who are 16 and older. This bill gives them the right to apply to have permission to be here, to work, and to drive. To do this, they must have an good record and get interviewed by the immigration . Others get the opportunity by serving our country. The one they want to destroy with their house building. 1.2 million of them serve us. Approximately half of them go by the name “Juan”. The United States is on the verge of losing our beloved country to many people who want help their lazy 90 year old parent. They are here to bomb us, and we must not let them become legal because we do not want them to take jobs we don’t want. The united states troops are to be sent to the border and demolish anything from entering. Not even a successful kid in the U.S is to stay, kick them out immediately for wanting to create jobs. ![]() Satire: The other Side by Clinton Perez is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The author Deborah Heiligman used very unusual syntax in his book " Charles and Emma : The Darwin's leap of faith. On page 9 of the book, he uses very peculiar key letters. He uses many dashes along his paragraph or in it I should say. An example would be when he uses it in the words " sister-in-law". One of the reason he did this was probably because he wanted show that all of the words are one together. Not literally but when you pronounce it, possibly. As well as showing the readers that you say it all together not individually. This wasn't the only place she uses dashes. She also uses it in the second paragraph. She unusually uses it some quotation marks. That wasn't why it was unusual. She placed them before the word and after in the quotation marks itself. That's something you don't really see often. She must have a reason to have done that though. She could have done that to show that the reader should have seen those words or that those words are very important to the plot in the book. Most likely she was trying to emphasize that it was important. ![]() Syntax by Clinton Perez is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The article was not indeed funny. Though there were a few chuckles, I honestly thought it wasn't funny. She is your mother which really doesn't make it funny but on the contrary serious and nasty. Maybe a few hyper-boles would have made it funnier or at least funny. The article was satire. Even though it wasn't funny, it did try to bring in a few laughs which in my opinion failed. In a satire there are always a purpose in the article. This had a purpose or a .. point. The point in this article was basically that insist is wrong. The point is sometimes focused on a serious event and I'm guessing this is one of those serious events. Insist is wrong. They're your family. You're closest friends, your blood. Since based on serious events, I guess that this has happened before and are trying to prevent this from happening again since this is "serious". What I have just implied are devices that are to show or prove to you that this indeed was a satire. The article has all the qualities of a satire, like a point behind it, it was comedy, and was based on serious events. ![]() Dating your mom: Satire or no? by Clinton Perez is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |